Skip to content

Independent finished-product clinical results

Deep wrinkles soften. GLP Complex visibly restores lost facial volume.

By SeneGence · Updated

GLP Complex™ with SenePlex+® and Exosomes reduced deep-wrinkle appearance by a mean 11.2% at four weeks and 23.4% at eight weeks. Image analysis separately measured an 8.4% mean improvement in the look of facial volume at eight weeks.

GLP Complex™ with SenePlex+® and Exosomes

What the study measured

Tested product
GLP Complex™ with SenePlex+® and Exosomes
Independent laboratory
Essex Testing Clinic
Participants
31 participants completed the study.
Method and timing
A trained technician took digital images of each participant’s face at baseline and after four and eight weeks of product use. ImagePro software analyzed changes in the appearance of deep wrinkles and facial volume as separate endpoints.

All 31 participants showed improved deep-wrinkle appearance at four and eight weeks. At eight weeks, 81% showed improvement in the look of facial volume.

Study design and limits

How this study was built, and what that means for reading its numbers.

  • All 31 participants who completed the study used GLP Complex, and every image is compared with that participant’s own baseline image. The topline includes no untreated or placebo comparison group.
  • A trained technician took digital images of each face at baseline and after four and eight weeks; ImagePro software read deep wrinkles and facial volume as two separate endpoints.
  • The week-4 facial-volume change (2.5%, p=0.486) was not statistically significant. The facial-volume result is the week-8 change (8.4%, p=0.044).
  • The two-page laboratory topline is marked as preliminarily reviewed by Quality Assurance, and slight data changes may follow final review.

The complete measured results

GLP Complex image-analysis results for deep-wrinkle appearance and facial volume.
In an independent study of 31 participants measured by image analysis, GLP Complex™ with SenePlex+® and Exosomes reduced the appearance of deep wrinkles by 11.2% at four weeks and 23.4% at eight weeks, and improved the look of facial volume by 8.4% at eight weeks.
Deep-wrinkle appearance by image analysis · n=31
TimepointMean score ± SDMean change from baselineParticipants improvingp-value vs. baseline
Baseline772.6 ± 197.0———
4 weeks686.3 ± 152.1−11.2%100%<0.001
8 weeks591.6 ± 105.4−23.4%100%<0.001

A lower deep-wrinkle score means a better-looking result, so the mean score drops equal improvements of 11.2% at week 4 and 23.4% at week 8.

Facial-volume appearance by image analysis · n=31
TimepointMean score ± SDMean change from baselineParticipants improvingp-value vs. baseline
Baseline289.8 ± 83.4———
4 weeks297.0 ± 91.12.5%65%0.486 · not significant
8 weeks314.0 ± 96.58.4%81%0.044

A higher facial-volume score indicates improved appearance. The four-week facial-volume mean change of 2.5% was not statistically significant (p=0.486); the supported facial-volume benefit is the eight-week result (p=0.044). Mean change describes the average measured change, while participants improving describes the share with any improvement. SD means standard deviation.

Study context and original source

These results describe the appearance of deep wrinkles and facial volume with the finished GLP Complex formula. The measurements are cosmetic image-analysis endpoints; ingredient studies have their own separate test frames.

The Essex Testing Clinic two-page preliminary laboratory topline is reproduced in the original PDF (pages 2–3). It is marked as preliminarily reviewed by Quality Assurance; slight data changes may follow final QA review. The tables above retain every reported timepoint, mean, standard deviation, participant response rate, and p-value.